Could we perhaps find for long-term solutions to at least resolve such cases quickly? And missing persons cases seem to happen in Malaysia a lot. And so why haven't we come up with solutions so that such things don't happen anymore? Or at least, have methods that we can apply to resolve such cases quick…before any harm befalls the missing person

www-nst-com-my.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nst.com.my/amp/news/nation/2025/02/1169549/experts-deba… Experts debate PKR's uncontested leadership talks By Mohamad Al As "Experts debate PKR's uncontested leadership talks Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's senior political secretary, Datuk Seri Shamsul Iskandar Md Akin said, “Contesting is democracy. Not contesting is also democracy. When there is no contest, it means negotiations have taken place. Negotiation itself is democracy.” Bernama pic "KUALA LUMPUR: Ongoing negotiations within Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) to avoid contests for its top positions may be crucial in ensuring political stability, but concerns are raised over democratic principles, transparency, and credibility. "Rather than risk splitting the party as the government is not fully stable yet, not having a contest is good. However, it is bad in terms of democracy," said International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) lecturer Assistant Professor Dr Lau Zhe Wei when reached by the New Straits Times. This was after Anwar's senior political secretary, Datuk Seri Shamsul Iskandar Md Akin, confirmed that negotiations are underway to avoid a contest for the presidential and deputy presidential positions in May. Shamsul said, "Contesting is democracy. Not contesting is also democracy. When there is no contest, it means negotiations have taken place. Negotiation itself is democracy." Lau argued that negotiations, by nature, exclude many party members from decision-making, and are therefore not democratic. "One thing's for sure; negotiation is not democracy because in a negotiation, not everyone is involved. Only stakeholders are involved," he added. Nevertheless, he also dismissed the likelihood of a challenge for the party's presidency. "I don't think there would be any contest. Especially after Azmin Ali is no longer in the party, I couldn't see there being any candidate able to challenge Anwar Ibrahim," he said. He also acknowledged that if an agreement was broadly accepted, internal divisions could be minimised. "If they really managed to come to a kind of negotiation that is agreeable to everybody, like what happened in Bersatu, then there shouldn't be any cohesion issue," he said. IIUM political analyst and Iseas-Yusof Ishak Institute fellow Associate Professor Dr Syaza Shukri, on the other hand, said that negotiations can be democratic, but stressed the need for transparency. "It has to at least be transparent. Who is involved in this negotiation? On what basis did they make the decision? Do they have members' consent to negotiate on their behalf? "This does not reflect well for a party that was founded on reformist ideals," she said. She argued that both the presidency and deputy presidency should be contested, even if the outcome is predictable. "Although we know realistically if it goes to election, Anwar would still hold the president post, it should be tested. Similarly with the deputy, it is an important position that needs the members' support for the stability and cohesion of the party," she said. Syaza warned that avoiding elections could fuel internal dissatisfaction, particularly for the deputy president position, which has multiple contenders. "I believe there would be those who are unhappy with this decision, especially for the deputy post. This could lead to further factionalism," she noted. While acknowledging that elections also create divisions, she argued that they provide legitimacy to the winners. "After the result is tallied, there is credibility for the winning candidate and the party can close ranks again. Without an election, it becomes a forced top-down unity," she said. Meanwhile, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia law and policy researcher and lecturer Associate Professor Dr Muhammad Fathi Yusof said that the right to conduct internal negotiations exists within PKR but must not override members' constitutional rights to contest. "They have the freedom to have such arrangements. But finally, the decision must not in any way prevent members who want to contest," he said. He, however, cautioned that party rules must be upheld, regardless of any supposed negotiation. "It cannot be binding because the constitution of the party that gives freedom to their members to participate in party leadership must prevail," he added."

www-nst-com-my.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nst.com.my/amp/opinion/columnists/2025/02/1169246/asean… Asean must use science diplomacy to get to space "By Zakri Abdul Hamid Collaboration with global space entities can lead to projects that address development issues. IN a New Year message delivered on Jan 21, Science, Technology and Innovation Minister Chang Lih Kang proposed that Malaysia embark on a major initiative in the space economy with Asean members. This is also timely as it coincides with Malaysia assuming the chairmanship of Asean this year. Coined by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2006, the space economy covers exploration, research and technology applications. It has become an important part of global infrastructure, driving the emergence of new technologies, such as small satellites, broadband and the Internet of Things. McKinsey & Company highlights its potential to create value across industries and solve global challenges In 2024, the space economy was valued at US$596 billion, largely due to satellite communications. Analysts predict it could reach US$1.8 trillion by 2035. Satellite services, especially satellite communications, are considered the largest contributor to the space economy. This figure includes satellites, launchers, and services like broadcast television or GPS. Space technology also helps companies across industries generate revenues. Grab, for example, relies on satellite signals and smartphone chips to connect drivers and riders while providing navigation in every city. The United States, China, and Russia are the main players in the global space economy. India, France, and the Netherlands are increasing their involvement. However, these countries lack adequate indigenous technological know-how and infrastructure in the space economy. Asean solidarity can play a key role. Science diplomacy connects us with advanced nations, providing access to knowledge, training, and technology through partnerships with space agencies, such as the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs and the European Space Agency. Through joint research programmes and international fellowships, we can build expertise in satellite technology, remote sensing, and space applications. Asean countries face challenges in formulating space policies and regulatory frameworks. Through science diplomacy, they can engage in international discussions, align policies with global best practices, and secure representation in decision-making bodies such as the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. We can help ensure that space laws are not skewed in favour of developed nations, advocating for fair access to orbits, radio frequencies, and space resources. With increasing commercialisation of space (for example, asteroid mining, satellite constellations), developing nations risk being left behind. Science diplomacy helps advocate for an inclusive global space governance system that ensures fair benefits from space-based assets. It can help ensure that space applications benefit local economies through improved climate monitoring, disaster management, precision agriculture, and connectivity. (For example, satellite broadband for rural areas.) Collaboration with global space agencies can lead to projects that address development issues, such as early warning systems for natural disasters or monitoring deforestation. Science diplomacy can create an enabling environment for foreign direct investment in local space industries by facilitating cooperation between governments, international agencies, and private sector players, such as SpaceX and OneWeb. Developing countries can use diplomatic channels to negotiate technology-sharing agreements and attract investments in satellite manufacturing, ground stations, and launch facilities. Furthermore, engaging in science diplomacy ensures that Asean nations contribute to discussions on the peaceful use of outer space, space debris mitigation and space security. It enables them to push for frameworks that prevent the monopolisation of space resources. After all, space is one of four areas recognised by the UN as the common heritage of humankind, the other three being Antarctica, the high seas and the atmosphere. By leveraging science diplomacy, Asean can overcome barriers to entry into the space economy, ensuring their participation in the global space sector while aligning space initiatives with their sustainable development goals. However, these are early days. Chang said "a comprehensive mapping of the moonshot project needs to be detailed to know the actual resource requirements needed". The Malaysian Industry-Government Group for High Technology (Might) and the Malaysian Space Agency, two agencies under the ministry, must respond to the minister's call." The writer is joint-chairman of Might, and the founding director of UCSI-IISDS

codeblue.galencentre.org/2025/02/housemen-bullying-at-ipoh-general-hospital-a-scandal-ignored-hou… Housemen Bullying At Ipoh General Hospital: A Scandal Ignored — Houseman "A houseman alleges bullying of housemen at Raja Permaisuri Bainun Hospital, Ipoh, such as physical assault, being forced to work double and triple shifts, revocation of mandatory off days if MC is taken, and denial of replacement leave for public holidays." "The Malaysian health care system is under fire as alarming reports of bullying, abuse, and exploitation of housemen continue to emerge from Raja Permaisuri Bainun Hospital (HRPB) in Ipoh, Perak. Despite widespread awareness and even legal notices, the Ipoh general hospital’s management and the Ministry of Health (MOH) seem to be turning a blind eye to this deeply entrenched culture of abuse." 1 "A Toxic Workplace: The Reality Behind Closed Doors Housemen, the backbone of patient care, are supposed to learn and grow under the guidance of senior doctors. Instead, many face relentless verbal abuse, humiliation, and crushing workloads. Public shaming during ward rounds, impossible deadlines, and a complete lack of mentorship are just the tip of the iceberg. Shocking evidence has now surfaced of physical abuse. In one recent incident, a specialist allegedly struck a houseman for daring to voice dissatisfaction. Even though a legal notice was sent to HRPB and the MOH, no action was taken. Instead, the perpetrator was rewarded with a promotion. It doesn’t stop there. Early last year, a viral post on social media detailed a case of sexual abuse of a houseman. Yet again, no action was taken, leaving the accused free to continue their career while the victim’s suffering was ignored. These stories highlight a system that punishes the vulnerable and shields the powerful. Adding to this, numerous complaints to the human resources department about bullying and abuse have allegedly been ignored or, worse, actively covered up. Housemen have reported that HR officials collude with specialists and higher management to sweep these issues under the rug, further deepening the culture of impunity." 2 "The Crushing Mental Health Toll The psychological toll on housemen is devastating. Anxiety, depression, and burnout are rampant, forcing some to resign or transfer. This not only shatters careers, but also intensifies the ongoing shortage of medical professionals in Malaysia. How can a nation expect quality health care when its youngest doctors are driven to the brink?" 3 "A System That Flouts the Law If emotional and physical abuse weren’t enough, housemen are also subjected to outright illegal practices: -Inhumane Work Hours: Forced to work double and triple shifts in violation of Malaysian labour laws. -Punitive Measures: Mandatory off days are revoked if housemen take medical leave, an illegal yet normalised punishment. -Denied Replacement Leave: Housemen are refused replacement leave for public holidays, with management citing “service needs.” Meanwhile, specialists and senior medical officers enjoy their entitlements without question. If the service collapses without housemen, why do their seniors get a pass? Why Does This Keep Happening? The root causes of this systemic abuse are clear: -Rigid Hierarchies: The traditional medical hierarchy breeds a culture of fear and unquestioned submission. -Stress-Induced Abuse: Overburdened senior doctors often lash out, perpetuating a toxic cycle. -Toxic Traditions: Some view abuse as a “rite of passage,” cementing a destructive culture. Institutional Collusion: Instead of addressing complaints, HR departments and higher management appear complicit in maintaining the status quo. -Incompetent Oversight: The MOH must address the glaring issue of unqualified staff managing complaints and investigations. Hiring competent professionals to handle such matters is crucial to restoring trust and ensuring justice. -Lack of Awareness Among Housemen: Housemen need to educate themselves on their rights and muster the courage to stand up against tyrannical behavior. Empowering themselves with knowledge is the first step to challenging the toxic environment." 4 "Lip Service Isn’t Enough The MOH has introduced initiatives like anonymous reporting channels and ethics workshops, but these measures have proven grossly inadequate. Fear of retaliation silences many housemen, while others have no faith in the system’s ability to deliver justice. The Urgent Need for Change This crisis demands immediate and decisive action: -Zero-Tolerance Policies: Implement strict anti-bullying rules with real consequences for violators. -Empowered Oversight: Create independent bodies to investigate abuse allegations, bypassing hospital management’s bias. -Supportive Mentorship: Assign mentors who can guide housemen without exploiting or intimidating them. -Mental Health Resources: Provide accessible, stigma-free counseling for all housemen. -Transparent Justice: Ensure swift legal action against offenders, sending a clear message that abuse will not be tolerated. Enough Is Enough The scandal of houseman bullying at Ipoh General Hospital is a damning indictment of Malaysia’s health care system. This isn’t just about workplace ethics — it’s about justice, dignity, and the future of the nation’s health care. How many more careers must be destroyed, how many more voices silenced, before real change happens? It’s time to break the silence and demand accountability. The well-being of housemen and the integrity of Malaysia’s health care system depend on it. The funny part is that when the MOH wanted to implement the Waktu Bekerja Berlainan (WBB) shift system pilot project, specialists and senior medical officers felt it was unfair. The majority of these people are the ones who subject houseman to these kinds of conditions. The irony." The author is a houseman at HRPB. CodeBlue is giving the author anonymity because civil servants are prohibited from writing to the press. Editor’s note: CodeBlue sought comments from the MOH prior to the publication of this article." 5

Hope to contribute on medical premiums from my 30 years working in the industry. Will share the industry secrets and what the rakyat should expect. No more paying for 20 years and still getting huge premium increases!

YB. Happy Chinese new year 🧧

With PSA we the Rakyat expect more from each of you MPs. Where are the list of reforms? Fixed PM tenure, equal CDF, reform seat allocation on interstate and intra state malapportionment, AG PP split, education system reform to name a few. And does PSA allow you to vote with conscience? Does PSA increase the number of seating days?

Semoga SSH senang rakyat jgn dilupakan.. GERAN tanah SARATA.. bila nk LULUS kn..hehe..

More red tapes.