Appreciate your honesty YB Lee Shows that you care and able to see what is really there infront of us

I do have hope. Nature is enormously resilient, humans are vastly intelligent, the energy and enthusiasm that can be kindled among young people seems without limit, and he human spirit is indomitable. But if we want life, we will have to stop depending on someone else to save the world. It is up to us-you and me, all of us. Myself, I have placed my faith in the children. – Jane Goodall

good to know & see YB respond & reply as compared to ano neighbor MP who post but NEVER respond/reply. cheers all the best & take care & enjoy🙏🫶🤭

YB take a break after your meeting and go around Germany. It's a beautiful country. Full of history

YB Lee, awesome achievement! Keep it up 👍 and proud of your success. Jia you!

www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2025/06/11/merit-alone-wont-work-in-multiracial-malaysi… Merit alone won’t work in multiracial Malaysia, says Fuziah "Senator Fuziah Salleh calls on policymakers to prioritise need over race, and to promote respect rather than mere tolerance in fostering national unity."

Well done!

great !

The heat today in Petaling Jaya is unbearable YB

Awesome YB.

📸 Instagram: instagram.com/cheanchung 🐦 Twitter: twitter.com/cheanchung 📠 Telegram: t.me/cheanchung 🎵 Tiktok: www.tiktok.com/@cheanchung81?_t=8ffkPIaw7pS&_r=1 📱 WhatsApp: chat.whatsapp.com/CcijD3jzUUNLIuVDkhJ18F

Rindu Kuala Selangor. TQ singgah YB!

Gd to take time out YB, rest & recharge 🙏

Mantap

HIRUK YB

Terbaik YB…

👍👍👍

nice shoot yb!

www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2025/06/11/merit-alone-wont-work-in-multiracial-malaysi… Merit alone won’t work in multiracial Malaysia, says Fuziah "Senator Fuziah Salleh calls on policymakers to prioritise need over race, and to promote respect rather than mere tolerance in fostering national unity."

m.malaysiakini.com/columns/745390 COMMENT | Dr M's 'leaky umbrella' will not save Malays By Mariam Mokhtar "COMMENT | For several decades, Malaysians have been bombarded with messages that they are the “supreme race” (ketuanan Melayu), that they are the rightful owners of this land. And if we are not careful, Malaysia will be “sold” to the Chinese – not just any old Chinese, but the Singaporean Chinese, as if that was the benchmark for the worst form of Chinese. When the occasion suits the bigots, the Malay population will be told of the threat that Christianity or the Communists will have on them. Their lands will be re-colonised, their language will be banned, and their way of life will be changed beyond recognition. These insecure Malays, whose ages range from their teens to their seventies, and who come from both the rural and urban communities, firmly believe that “the Chinese will overrun this country”. Somehow, the Indians are not perceived as a threat. When will the Malays understand that the stories about the Chinese taking over are just lies by manipulating leaders? The truth is that these extremist groups are afraid of losing their hold on the Malays and, by extension, their grip on power. Nevertheless, on June 5, former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad announced the formation of a Malay secretariat committee, which he termed a “big umbrella”, with the sole purpose of unifying the Malay community. Acknowledging the inability to act on his own, he met other political leaders in Putrajaya. They included Perikatan Nasional chairperson Muhyiddin Yassin, Bersatu deputy president Hamzah Zainudin, and PAS deputy president Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man. Mahathir convinced the other leaders that they had to restore Malay power in government. Then, at a press conference at the Perdana Leadership Foundation in Putrajaya, he said, “They (Malays) need fighters to champion their cause. Right now, they don’t have a dedicated fighter. “We’re not concerned with other problems, we just want to focus on one struggle – the struggle to save the Malays.” What does Mahathir mean by "save the Malays"? Save them from whom or what? Old guard Confident, self-assured and progressive Malays can disregard Mahathir's facetious statement, but what about less assured ones who wholeheartedly believe that they will lose out to the Chinese? Malaysia's longest-serving prime minister, who also served two terms in office, is responsible for a good many of these lies. He may not be in power, but he has a powerful mouthpiece in other extremist Malay NGOs or political parties. When asked about Umno-Baru being part of the "umbrella", Mahathir said he was willing to accept Umno-Baru members as long as they supported and believed in the cause. It is impossible to believe that Mahathir and his new committee will make much headway in multicultural Malaysia. The leaders whom he met are of the old guard, and it would not surprise anyone to know that they will fail to inspire many Malays, especially the younger generation. PAS' Tuan Ibrahim agreed with Mahathir, who said that one of the main reasons for Malay disunity was the proliferation of political parties which prospered under the country's system of democracy. So, what is Mahathir suggesting? That authoritarianism is the way for Malay unity, and the future direction of Malaysia? Mahathir urged intellectuals, corporate figures, politicians and religious scholars with the same shared interest to unite the Malays. His perception of the Malays as weak is possibly true, but this is the result of decades of dependence on government crutches. Competition is discouraged, and Malays and non-Malays compete on an uneven playing field. No love for Malays The Malays who would like to shelter under Mahathir's umbrella must be made to realise that his reasoning is flawed. Policies that favour the Malays are based on greed and an inferiority complex. Only weak-willed Malays will allow themselves to be manipulated into thinking that Malays should hold all the power. Only insecure Malays will allow themselves to be used as political pawns by this new committee. The Malay is not trapped by his success; he is trapped by his own lethargy and lack of curiosity. This self-imposed mental imprisonment of the Malay mind and his lack of physical exertion will prove his downfall. Mahathir has no love for the Malays. How could he? He is indirectly saying that they are useless and cannot stand on their own two feet. Many Malays are also denied the freedom of choice. When the Malay is too lazy to think for himself, he denies himself the benefits of education and economic empowerment. A lack of aspiration means that the Malay wallows in self-pity. Mahathir and his new committee should not be allowed to strip the Malays of their dignity. We've had enough of the attempts by religious and race-based parties to strip the country of its unity and identity." MARIAM MOKHTAR is a defender of the truth, the admiral-general of the Green Bean Army, and the president of the Perak Liberation Organisation (PLO). Blog, X. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.

m.malaysiakini.com/columns/745353 COMMENT | Trust your land title? Hidden dangers you must know By GK Ganesan “The earth does not belong to us; we belong to the earth.” – Ted Perry, 1971 "COMMENT | You wake up one morning. You check your land title. A stranger’s name stares back at you. This happened to Chen Wei Pin, a Taiwanese businessperson. Someone placed a private caveat on his Selangor land. The caveat claimed he sold the property. He had not. The documents were forged. The land office was fooled. Chen was left fighting for what was rightfully his. His story is not unique. In three years, nearly 500 land scam cases surfaced in Malaysia. Losses approached RM300 million. Each case represents a family’s shattered dreams. Each victim trusted the system. The system failed them repeatedly. Land scammers are chameleons. They adapt and they evolve. They exploit every weakness in our system. Here are their favourite tricks. Method one: The master forger Fraudsters forge everything. Identity cards. Land titles. Powers of attorney. They target absentee owners. The elderly. Those living overseas. People who rarely check their land. The scammer creates fake documents. They “sell” the land to innocent buyers. The buyers only learn the truth when the real owner appears. By then, it is often too late for both the owner and the new buyer. Real story: Eight businesspeople in Batu Pahat paid over RM300,000 for agricultural land. Their “leases” were worthless. The documents were fake. Insiders at the district land office had prepared them. They exploited their access to land records." Part 1

BKN ke untuk Wargaemas jurr

📸 Instagram: instagram.com/cheanchung 🐦 Twitter: twitter.com/cheanchung 📠 Telegram: t.me/cheanchung 🎵 Tiktok: www.tiktok.com/@cheanchung81?_t=8ffkPIaw7pS&_r=1 📱 WhatsApp: chat.whatsapp.com/CcijD3jzUUNLIuVDkhJ18F

An article from Malaysiakini: Court of Appeal defers decision on ex-AG's judge recusal bid "Summary: -The Putrajaya Court of Appeal defers the decision on Tommy Thomas' bid to recuse High Court judge Roz Mawar Rozain in Shahrir Samad’s lawsuit against him. -The court fixes June 12 for case management to set a decision date." xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxFull Story Herexxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "The Putrajaya Court of Appeal has deferred the decision on former attorney-general Tommy Thomas' application to recuse the High Court judge in the lawsuit filed against him by former Felda chairperson Shahrir Samad. The deferment was made after a three-judge panel chaired by Supang Lian heard submissions from both parties in an online session today. According to The Star, Thomas' lawyer Alan Gomez argued that the application for Roz Mawar Rozain to be recused was not based on personal grounds but to ensure a fair trial. He said Roz, having rejected Thomas' (above) bid to strike out Shahrir's claim last year, might have formed a premature opinion even prior to the start of the trial. He further contended that Roz had made conclusions in the pre-trial phase that were not substantiated by evidence and should thus recuse herself. On the other hand, Shahrir's counsel Firoz Hussein Ahmad Jamaluddin countered by saying that Roz's statements were inferential in nature and did not constitute factual determinations on the merits of the case. The court fixed June 12 for case management to set a decision date. Shahrir’s suit Thomas submitted the recusal application on Aug 26 last year, asserting that Roz had made several unfounded conclusions and issued statements that conflicted with both the claims outlined in the suit and the evidence brought before the court. However, in opposing the application, Shahrir contended that a judge should not step down solely because a party disagrees with her legal reasoning. On Jan 14, the Kuala Lumpur High Court dismissed Thomas’ application to recuse Roz from the defamation suit brought by Shahrir and three others against him. Shahrir filed the suit against Thomas, former MACC chief commissioner Latheefa Koya, MACC, and the government on Dec 4, 2023, for alleged malicious prosecution. Former Felda chairperson Shahrir Samad He is also suing the quartet for malicious investigation and wrongful arrest. This is over the money-laundering case involving RM1 million received from former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak, of which he was acquitted on Jan 5. The full acquittal came on the heels of testimony from a prosecution witness, MACC investigating officer Nurzahidah Yacop, that Thomas in 2020 gave the green light for Shahrir to be charged in court despite an incomplete investigation paper."

m.malaysiakini.com/news/745260 Anwar wants new people's housing near public transport "Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim proposed that new people's housing projects be developed on or near public transport stations, as a move to encourage more comprehensive use of the public transport system. Anwar said that such a housing development concept would not only provide more strategic residences for low-income groups but also pave the way for a more sustainable and organised urban lifestyle. “There are proposals to develop housing directly on top of public transport stations, but this requires certain amendments (to laws) and is currently being worked on. “An example is the Kota Madani project, where I emphasised comprehensive and centralised basic amenities for the welfare of the people, including vertical development,” he said. The Prime Minister was speaking at the Malaysia Madani Scholars’ Forum (FIM) Series 6 in Petaling Jaya last night. The forum, organised by the Higher Education Ministry,, discussed the topic “Transport for the People: Balancing Affordability, Quality, and Sustainability of Public Transport”. Also participating as panellists were Transport Minister Anthony Loke; Prasarana Malaysia Berhad president and group chief executive officer Mohd Azharuddin Mat Sah; and Universiti Putra Malaysia vice-chancellor Ahmad Farhan Mohd Sadullah. Meanwhile, Anwar said that open discourse platforms like the forum were crucial to ensure government policies were formulated by considering the voices of various parties, including academicians, industry experts, government supporters, and even the opposition. Significant policy changes needed Anwar said the organisation of such forums proved that the government did not shut down criticism, but instead encouraged differing views, provided they were delivered professionally and constructively. “I appreciate the openness of the panellists who made subtle suggestions and proposals. I don’t consider this negative criticism. I take note of the matters (suggestions), I will write them down, and I will bring these issues to the cabinet meeting tomorrow,” he said. Meanwhile, Loke, commenting on Anwar's call for new developments near public transport facilities, said the new measure being discussed by the government would involve conceptual changes in urban development and planning. He said housing development with access to public transport facilities required significant changes in terms of policy and paradigm, with the objective of encouraging mobility and strategic home ownership for the people. According to Loke, if housing can be developed near public transport stations, reliance on private vehicles can be reduced. “One of the matters we are discussing with the Housing and Local Government Ministry is the provision of guidelines for housing projects, such as apartments located near public transport stations. “This includes the reduction of parking requirements due to having access to public transport,” he said. – Bernama"

m.malaysiakini.com/columns/745246 COMMENT | Three concerns regarding Urban Renewal Act By Mah Hang Soon COMMENT | The recently proposed Urban Renewal Act (URA) by the government has raised concerns among members of the public. They say this new law, aimed at revitalising and modernising areas which are deemed as “urban decay” with “ageing infrastructure”, will backfire and instead be harmful to residents, especially those who are in vulnerable groups. Any policy, regardless of how well-intentioned it is, should also take into account the overall feedback of the affected residents, and steps should be taken to address their concerns. From our research and reviews, we have determined three main problems regarding the URA. 1. Consent thresholds According to the URA draft, as long as a certain percentage of consent is reached, the private developer will be allowed to proceed with their redevelopment plans, therefore ignoring the voices from the minority. While some may claim that the majority has the right, others may see it as the minority being denied their rights. This is especially true in older communities, where most of the residents may be senior citizens or hail from low-income groups. The concern arising is that private developers will approach larger households only to gain their consent, thus ignoring the minorities, and therefore “forcing” them to accept unfair compensation. This goes against the government’s concept of “One Family, One House”. 2. Will it see the exclusion of low- and middle-income groups? While urban renewal aims to bring a higher quality of life and better living environment, at the same time there is the fear that this new standard of living will incur high costs, thus denying the original residents, who are from low- and middle-income groups, from returning to their old homes. Thus, the government is urged to ensure that a mechanism is implemented to allow these former residents to return to their homes, or that proper resettlement and compensation are given to them. 3. Ecological and cultural considerations While we welcome modernisation and redevelopment, we cannot forget what is termed as “the soul of the city”. Cities are more than buildings and highways. They also comprise their people who live, work and make memories in it. Thus, old neighbourhoods are often intrinsically tied to their communities. Any move to demolish these buildings will cause not just a change in physical structure, but also the memories of the community. As such, steps must be taken to preserve urban culture and heritage, so as to prevent the city from losing its “soul”. For example, in medical care, the aim is not merely to prolong one’s life, but rather to enhance the quality of life. This also rings true for urban development. The government should do more than build new infrastructure. Urban renewal must also take into account the community and its people’s way of life. As such, it is hoped that the government will review these issues that we have raised, and take the necessary steps to allay the fears of the people." DR MAH HANG SOON is MCA deputy resident. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.

Leng Chai suda mali maa..

Tq YB kacak.

Abe Wan Gende 💪💪💪